[ SECRET POST #4753 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4753 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________












04. [SPOILERS for Sanditon]

[Lord Babington/Esther Denham]


__________________________________________________



05. [SPOILERS for Legion]



__________________________________________________



06. [SPOILERS for Doctor Who, Life Is Strange]



__________________________________________________



07. [SPOILERS for Doctor Who]



__________________________________________________



08. [WARNING for discussion of abuse]



__________________________________________________



09. [WARNING for discussion of sexual abuse of a minor]
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 07 secrets from Secret Submission Post #680.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

nayrt

Well no, the OP is mostly saying that you shouldn't judge a persons behaviours on their interests. Overstating that all people who are interested in problematic ships implies that only people who have those tastes can be violent/abusive. It runs, in their experience, the risk of then implying that people who's interests are relatively tame can't be violent/abusive.
It can go either way is what they're saying, imo. The person who made the first comment is purposely condemning the OP because they disagrees, and saying that the OP's experience is somehow less because

SA (sorry post got cut off)

[(Anonymous)]

*disagree

**because of it.

[(Anonymous)]

Nice attempt at trying to differentiate, but OP is essentially doing the same thing. They're saying their experience is the definitive one.