Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2020-02-06 05:37 pm
[ SECRET POST #4780 ]
⌈ Secret Post #4780 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 16 secrets from Secret Submission Post #683.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2020-02-06 11:42 pm (UTC)(link)Sexism is an ever-present issue for me when it’s a jerk guy/woman pairing. Even when the guy himself isn’t all that sexist, there’s inherent sexism in the fact that he can be the way he is, and do the shit he does, and say the shit he says, and treat people (including her) the way he does, and get away with it all. And meanwhile she’s almost always tasked with being the straight man and the professional and the responsible one who cares about the rules for both of them.
Like, that same dynamic isn’t really okay when it’s M/M, but it doesn’t feel nearly as tied into systemic bullshit as it does when it’s M/F.
Though for the record, I do ship some het ships like this anyway, despite my problems with them. I can just handle far more extreme versions when it’s M/M. Like, Mulder/Scully very much has elements of this and they’re a huge OTP for me. But I don’t think I would’ve been able to enjoy Johnlock (BBC version) if John had been female.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2020-02-07 12:20 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2020-02-07 12:38 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2020-02-07 04:16 am (UTC)(link)As far as chaotic/obnoxious man with stable, responsible woman pairings go, it was pretty mild and positive.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2020-02-07 12:44 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2020-02-07 12:12 am (UTC)(link)i'd still rather drop-kick all those male characters off a cliff however, much more fun to imagine.
Is it better or worse if they are both obnoxious?
(Anonymous) 2020-02-07 12:14 am (UTC)(link)Re: Is it better or worse if they are both obnoxious?
(Anonymous) 2020-02-07 12:22 am (UTC)(link)Do you have any examples of this pairing type?
Re: Is it better or worse if they are both obnoxious?
Re: Is it better or worse if they are both obnoxious?
(Anonymous) 2020-02-07 02:32 am (UTC)(link)Though this trope is also very much not synonymous with obnoxious/obnoxious ships. I mean, the example TV Tropes cites is Han/Leia - a pairing I do dislike - but Leia is not remotely the obnoxious character type.
Han/Lando, I guess, might be kind of close to a mutually obnoxious pairing? And it does sound more appealing to me than Han/Leia, but still not something I'd be interested in.
Re: Is it better or worse if they are both obnoxious?
(Anonymous) 2020-02-07 02:01 am (UTC)(link)Well, actually the image used is a good example, I think - Sam/Dean (Supernatural).
But also - Loki/Tony Stark & Tony Stark/Stephen Strange (Marvel Cinematic Universe), Steve/Danny (Hawaii Five-0), Arthur/Merlin (Merlin), Tony/Gibbs (NCIS), John/Rodney (Stargate Atlantis), etc.
I mean, they each tend to be obnoxious in at least slightly different ways, but both are.
Re: Is it better or worse if they are both obnoxious?
(Anonymous) 2020-02-07 02:20 am (UTC)(link)Arthur/Merlin didn't seem that way at all, in the episodes I watched. Gibbs didn't seem that way, though Tony somewhat did. I don't know John/Rodney or Steve/Danny at all.
The one I can see fitting the obnoxious/obnoxious dynamic the most is Tony/Stephen, and that's probably part of why it's completely uninteresting to me. They're just way too similar for my liking, and their flaws are way too similar. To me, that's boring.