case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2020-02-15 03:04 pm

[ SECRET POST #4789 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4789 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 54 secrets from Secret Submission Post #686.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2020-02-15 09:38 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't think what Rowling did with Dumbledore was even really objectionable, in itself. It'd be better if she had addressed it in the text, but OK, she didn't, fine.

What annoys me is people acting like she did address it in the text, or like there's no possible way she ever could have addressed it in the text.

(Anonymous) 2020-02-16 03:59 am (UTC)(link)
+1