Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2020-02-15 03:04 pm
[ SECRET POST #4789 ]
⌈ Secret Post #4789 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 54 secrets from Secret Submission Post #686.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2020-02-15 09:40 pm (UTC)(link)Like, I straight up admit my hypocrisy here: I shipped Johnlock for years, and Tony Stark is one of my favorite characters. But I’ll be the first to admit that neither Sherlock nor Tony is a remotely realistic depiction of genius.
TBH, I usually find the most realistic depictions of very high intelligence to be characters who are…almost a little bit boring. (Which is NOT me saying they shouldn’t be written. I sometimes like a little bit of mundanity in a character if it makes them feel more real and grounded.)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2020-02-16 12:02 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2020-02-16 12:12 am (UTC)(link)But the fact that he's a complex character doesn't really mean his genius, specifically, is well-written, IMO. He's still a savant to an absurd degree about pretty much every hard science out there. Within the context of something as OTT and unsubtle as the MCU, that kind of thing is fun and consistent with the story, so I'm happy to roll with it. But I still wouldn't call Tony's genius a well-written character element.