case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2020-02-15 03:04 pm

[ SECRET POST #4789 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4789 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 54 secrets from Secret Submission Post #686.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
meadowphoenix: (Default)

[personal profile] meadowphoenix 2020-02-16 05:20 am (UTC)(link)
I think there was plenty of reasons to read it in the text (like with actual textual criticism praxis you could write well-regarded articles about it and have them be deemed amazing), but no reason for her not to have made it explicit when dumbledore talks about his relationships with grindlewald for literally no plot reason besides harry wanted to know and was dead enough to be able to ask also dead dumbledore.