case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2020-04-06 05:54 pm

[ SECRET POST #4840 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4840 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[The Caligula Effect]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Binging with Babish (youtube)]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Wang Yibo as Lan Wangji in The Untamed]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Star Trek: Deep Space Nine]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Star Trek Voyager]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Fights Break Sphere, aka Battle Through the Heavens]












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 31 secrets from Secret Submission Post #693.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: A Question You're Afraid Is Too Dumb/Offensive to Ask

(Anonymous) 2020-04-07 05:23 pm (UTC)(link)
NAYRT but I think they just want to remind everyone not to trust people who are AMAB because they are more likely as a group to be abusers.

Which annoys the shit out of me, as a cis woman who has come in for a lot of shit from cis men, because maybe non-cis AMAB people are more likely to be abusive than all AFAB at birth people, (I actually don’t know, I’ve never seen studies or statistics on this and abuse by cis women tends to be underreported) but when it comes to individual abuse cases, that shit doesn’t matter.

Anyone can be an abuser, anyone can be a victim. Are their specific patterns that are more common? Yep. Does that mean that people who are statistically more likely to be victims can’t be abusers? Fuck off.