[ SECRET POST #4853 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4853 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.



__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.



__________________________________________________



10.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 51 secrets from Secret Submission Post #694.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

I'm curious why you assume that?

[(Anonymous)]

NAYRT - Because in M/M you can write the guy with the small dick as the bottom, in which case his small dick doesn't really make much difference to the sex they're having. Also, some fandoms do have a tendency to "feminize" the bottom character, and giving him a small dick is, for some people, just another way of doing that. (I know, I know, there is a lot of potentially ~problematic~ elements to everything I just said. I'm not endorsing it, nor am I condemning it. I'm just describing a thing fandom sometimes does.)

Whereas with M/F, the guy's small dick is inevitably going to impact the sex scenes. Not because the guy can't make it good for the woman, because obviously that's not true, but because it's going to change elements of the scene, especially descriptors.

[(Anonymous)]

That’s a really really weird assumption to make. It's not my kink personally, but as a theme I'd find it a lot more appealing to read in a F/M story than in slash.

[(Anonymous)]

That’s a really really weird assumption to make.

It's really not though. Like, have you ever lived in the world? At all?

Because the prevailing attitude, for better or worse, is that a big dick is a hotter fuck. I can't imagine you are unaware of this attitude. It's pretty much everywhere.

So it's honestly a pretty basic bit of logic that if the prevailing attitude is that a big dick is a hotter fuck and a small dick is a less hot fuck, small dicks are going to be more popular in scenarios where they don't have to do the fucking. Like, it's ABC really.

Again, not saying I agree with any of this. But it is what it is.

I'm not into this kink at all, but I'm especially, epically not into it in M/F. What do you get from it?

[(Anonymous)]

Consider this: it's small dick kink.

People are kinking on the small dick. They think the small dick is hot. Often, when women attracted to men find a dick hot they want it inside of them.

Does that make sense?