Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2020-04-22 05:41 pm
[ SECRET POST #4856 ]
⌈ Secret Post #4856 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 21 secrets from Secret Submission Post #694.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

I have a question.
(Anonymous) 2020-04-22 11:26 pm (UTC)(link)Some, of course, are more accurate or have less dramatic license taken, but I guarantee at least something included is speculation or didn't happen at all in each. Sometimes an effort is made to be respectful, but often they just want to tell an interesting story.
Re: I have a question.
(Anonymous) 2020-04-22 11:53 pm (UTC)(link)this argument is and always will be a complete false equivalence, and you can justify your want to write RPF with a simple 'bc i want to' instead of trying to act like PG movies about someone's life is at all the same thing. it isn't.
Re: I have a question.
(Anonymous) 2020-04-23 01:44 am (UTC)(link)I think you're making false equivalence yourself in thinking all RPF is porn. Sure a lot of fic is shipping and a good amount of that includes explicit or mature sexual situations, but not all of it.
And I can say there absolutely have been movies/TV shows based on real people with speculative or wholly fabricated romances.
Re: I have a question.
(Anonymous) 2020-04-23 01:56 am (UTC)(link)Re: I have a question.
(Anonymous) 2020-04-23 06:21 am (UTC)(link)No, but I don't think an RPF fic that ends with them declaring their love for each other and kissing is all that different from the blowjobs in the bathroom in The Social Network.
And just for you, I looked up BTS on AO3, of the ~120200 fics, and the Mature and Explicit rated fics make up about 39%, the Not Rated make up about 15%, the Teen And Up Audiences and General Audiences rated fics make up about 46%, and fics with a Mpreg tag of all ratings numbered ~2000 or about 1.7%.
Re: I have a question.
(Anonymous) 2020-04-23 12:06 am (UTC)(link)Like nothing makes me more pissed than that stupid 'Feud' show, or whatever it's called because it's 100% fake. Olivia De Havilland literally filed a lawsuit against it because of how bullshit it was, like they didn't just take advantage that these famous people we're dead so they couldn't say anything, they went as far as to slander still living legends because they could get away with it, and you know what? They fucking did, like fuck them!
"On June 30, 2017, a day before her 101st birthday, actress Olivia de Havilland filed a lawsuit against Feud: Bette and Joan for inaccurately portraying her and using her likeness without permission.[53] The lawsuit stated that the pseudo-documentary-style of the series leads viewers to believe that the statements made by the actress portraying de Havilland in the show are accurate, but that in fact de Havilland had not said such things in real life.[54] The various defendants filed a motion to dismiss under California's "anti-SLAPP" law. The trial court denied the motion but, on March 26, 2018, the California Court of Appeal, Second District, reversed the decision and ordered the lawsuit dismissed on the grounds that no person can "own history". The Court of Appeal further ruled the defendants were entitled to be reimbursed their attorneys' fees.[55] De Havilland filed for estoppels to pursue action with higher courts, securing a restraining order against Murphy and the production company from airing Feud until further review and a court date with the United States Supreme Court. In January 2019, the Supreme Court declined to hear the case.[56]"
^ From wiki.