case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2020-04-22 05:41 pm

[ SECRET POST #4856 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4856 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.



__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.



__________________________________________________



10.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 21 secrets from Secret Submission Post #694.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2020-04-24 02:34 pm (UTC)(link)
I prefer it. It's one thing if it's a fantasy setting with just the drapery of the Victorian era (or a steampunk setting) but if it's just a story set back in time then I expect it to be as historically accurate as possible, uncomfortable period attitudes and all, otherwise it's just revisionism. Escapism is fine and dandy but there are certain expectations when you're writing something you call historical that's supposed to be rooted in the reality of the time.

As an LGBT person myself I don't mind it, honestly. And I think sometimes it can be cathartic for some LGBT people themselves and I know a lot of LGBT people who write stories with such themes. I'm one of them.