case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2020-04-23 06:20 pm

[ SECRET POST #4857 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4857 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.



__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.



__________________________________________________



10.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 11 secrets from Secret Submission Post #694.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
philstar22: (Default)

Re: Question for the Dany critics

[personal profile] philstar22 2020-04-23 11:17 pm (UTC)(link)
And for the record, I'm not expecting perfect morality from fictional characters. But Dany didn't need to burn King's Landing to the ground. She could have destroyed the Lannister's and still avoided killing the poor and innocent who had no choice in anything and nothing to do with any of the wrongs against her. Actively choosing to do what she did, and doing it with such clear joy, was an active choice to take a destructive, no-holds-barred campaign of conquest and destruction on the whole world.