[ SECRET POST #4857 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4857 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.



__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.



__________________________________________________



10.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 11 secrets from Secret Submission Post #694.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Question for the Dany critics

[(Anonymous)]

What does that even mean? Deserved to be destroyed by an atomic bomb?

Re: Question for the Dany critics

[(Anonymous)]

Dresden wasn’t bombed with an a-bomb

Re: Question for the Dany critics

[(Anonymous)]

No shit. I said that a better analogy to what Dany did would be the atomic bombs being dropped on Japan.

Some rando said "Germans deserved it more". Deserved WHAT more? I was talking about the atomic bomb so I can only assume that.

Re: Question for the Dany critics

[(Anonymous)]

You brought up Japan as a comparison after Daenerys’s attack was compared to the bombings of Dresden (which the writers actually admitted was their inspiration).

Re: Question for the Dany critics

[(Anonymous)]

Yes. I was arguing that the atomic bombs are a better comparison. I don't give a shit what the writers say. They are morons.

Dany basically nuked a whole city AFTER she had won the battle. There was no reason for her to do it. The same goes for the atomic bombs. The allied victory over Japan was a certainty. There were no good reasons to destroy it. The amount of deaths were even similar (25,000 in Dresden, 200,000+ in Japan, and around 300,000 in King's Landing).

Re: Question for the Dany critics

[(Anonymous)]

If Anne Frank bombed Nazi Germany after they surrendered, I wouldn’t blame her either

Re: Question for the Dany critics

[(Anonymous)]

Except Anne Frank wouldn't because she wasn't a monster like Dany. :D

Re: Question for the Dany critics

[(Anonymous)]

mike drop

Re: Question for the Dany critics

[(Anonymous)]

The comparison doesn't hold up either because the people of Westeros didn't personally persecute and oppress Dany. Anyone who wanted her dead for being a Targaryen were dead themselves long before she invaded Westeros. She's the aggressor, not the victim lashing out at people who hurt her.

Re: Question for the Dany critics

[(Anonymous)]

Cersei had just killed Rhaegal and Missandei.

Gregor, who bashed baby Aegon against a wall before raping his mother, was also still around.

Re: Question for the Dany critics

[(Anonymous)]

LOL, and if Dany had given one solitary fuck about Elia and her kids, I could buy that as a reason for vengeance. But she never did, never even mentioned them once, so nah. (And in the books, she even thinks of Elia with vague contempt, but that's admittedly not revelant here.) And she was already planning to firebomb Cersei as soon as she landed in Westeros, way before Rhaegal and Missandei's deaths. And even all that is irrelevant to the point upthread, which is that the people of King's Landing didn't persecute Daenerys, and she killed them anyway.