case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2020-05-20 05:23 pm

[ SECRET POST #4884 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4884 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.



__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 19 secrets from Secret Submission Post #699.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2020-05-21 05:08 am (UTC)(link)
Maybe it's just the fandoms I roll in, but I see a lot of instances where the taller more "masculine" character in canon is feminized and shrank down a few inches in order to emphasize that "he's a total bottom guuuys~"

(Anonymous) 2020-05-21 06:08 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah it's this weird backlash against the "more masculine guy tops" trope. They try to be subversive of this trope but still have other tropes firmly embedded in their minds and that results in "look how subversive I am, making this masculine dude the BOTTOM but whoops, gotta make him smaller and weepy because he can't be a proper uke otherwise".

(Anonymous) 2020-05-21 02:43 pm (UTC)(link)
I'VE NOTICED THIS TOO! And almost everyone I complain to about it is like "so you don't think masculine dudes can bottom?" and I'm just like NO. That's not what I'm saying, I'm saying people change the masculine dudes personality entirely and force him into the same box the small and weepy bottom was in because THEY think that's a requirement and the only thing they've really switched up, if at all, is when it comes to size. All the other stereotypes are still there. There's also this forced feminization aspect to it sometimes that it's like fine if you're into it but they all protest that being an aspect of it at all when it's really obvious they have a kink/fetish for it...

different anon

(Anonymous) 2020-05-21 09:28 pm (UTC)(link)
Three billions years late, but yes, THANK YOU! Finally someone who gets it! I hate it when these people act like they're so original and subversive, but they're doing the exact thing they claim to hate. At least admit you just like that, don't claim the higher ground.