case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2020-05-23 02:06 pm

[ SECRET POST #4887 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4887 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.



__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 61 secrets from Secret Submission Post #700.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 - too big ], [ 1 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2020-05-24 12:45 am (UTC)(link)
I’m regularly pretty insulted by the idea that as a Gay I should be grateful for every single Gay Thing I can get. I agree with you, OP, that the crusading it-must-be-ideologically-perfect-or-bust crowd gets lame. But I hate being told that as a homo I’m supposed to be slavishly grateful for bad content.

(Anonymous) 2020-05-24 12:50 am (UTC)(link)
op mentioned the Magicians above so there's defintely room for legit criticism of terrible content. our problem in general is that fandom has a hard time differentiating between genuine crit and "well I just am not into this therefore it's objectively bad" crit, so whether or not any of it gets back to creators...is it going to make a differnece? are they going to dismiss honest criticism as being lumped in with the latter group or are they going to wisely know the difference and bring us better content? who's to say.