[ SECRET POST #4906 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4906 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[Vala Mal Doran from Stargate SG-1]


__________________________________________________


03.
[Fruits Basket]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Last Man]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Hadestown]


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.



__________________________________________________



11.
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 12 secrets from Secret Submission Post #702.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: DEAR SECRET MAKERS

[(Anonymous)]

I have made some from other threads and other anons have made some from my threads. Was this actually a rule?

Re: DEAR SECRET MAKERS

[(Anonymous)]

DA

Not a rule, but we're suggesting it should be to keep from having two people making secrets from the same comment. If you just make secrets from your own thread, then there won't be any repeats.

Re: DEAR SECRET MAKERS

[(Anonymous)]

Okay but then people like me who only make a couple a week won't anymore because we won't start threads since most of those secrets won't be made.

Re: DEAR SECRET MAKERS

[(Anonymous)]

Someone below said they make threads without making the secrets. So if they make the thread and specify in it that they won't be making the secrets, you could go in that thread and claim comments. But if a thread doesn't say that the person won't be making the secrets, assume that the person will be making them.

We just need a system of some kind so we don't have people doubling up.

Re: DEAR SECRET MAKERS

[(Anonymous)]

DA

Or you could lighten up and stop trying to arbitrarily police the comm.

Re: DEAR SECRET MAKERS

[(Anonymous)]

Feels like unnecessary work for Case to deal with duplicates. But maybe it doesn't take too much time.

Re: DEAR SECRET MAKERS

[(Anonymous)]

As opposed to fielding petty complaints?

They're not duplicates.

Re: DEAR SECRET MAKERS

[(Anonymous)]

wow defensive much?

Re: DEAR SECRET MAKERS

[(Anonymous)]

+1

Re: DEAR SECRET MAKERS

[(Anonymous)]

I love the idea of people making their own claim work. Claim potato!