case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2020-06-30 05:59 pm

[ SECRET POST #4925 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4925 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________


03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.




















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 31 secrets from Secret Submission Post #705.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2020-06-30 10:49 pm (UTC)(link)
The problem with the secret is that it reeks of "it's your fault you're offended" combined with being willfully blind to the connection between a fashion choice of one person (fictional or not) and another person who makes the same or similar choice in real life. It's dishonest for using the wrong argument, and pushes all responsibility of any perceived insult on, well, the person perceiving.

(Anonymous) 2020-07-01 05:17 am (UTC)(link)
Right. Because if you're offended, you're automatically right! Of course! It's totally not possible that some people get just a little fucking precious about anyone criticising a fictional character for their sartorial non-choices. Clearly.