Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2020-07-01 06:46 pm
[ SECRET POST #4926 ]
⌈ Secret Post #4926 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 21 secrets from Secret Submission Post #705.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2020-07-01 11:52 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2020-07-01 11:59 pm (UTC)(link)But again, my main point here is not so much to argue over whose version of Who is better. The presence or absence of these tropes isn't even the same as quality in the first place. What I do think is that, indisputably, peoples' reactions to and feelings about Moffat!Who were relevant to the way people approached Sherlock, in a way that peoples' reactions to RTD!Who weren't. Sherlock is much more similar tonally to Moffat!Who than RTD!Who for reasons that should be obvious. A lot of the objections that people raised to Sherlock were also raised about his run on Who. People who got frustrated at and disliked one often also came to dislike the other for similar reasons.
(My other main point was that SHERLOCKED was dumb as hell)