case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2020-08-04 07:10 pm

[ SECRET POST #4960 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4960 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[Ashes of Love]


__________________________________________________


03.
[BNA: Brand New Animal]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Lifetime Channel]


__________________________________________________



05.
[The Old Guard]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Giga Wrecker]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Star Wars]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Emma]






















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 24 secrets from Secret Submission Post #710.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
philstar22: (Default)

[personal profile] philstar22 2020-08-05 02:38 am (UTC)(link)
I'll give you that in a movie, there isn't a whole lot of time. But you can still show an expanse of time. Movies don't generally show real-time, meaning a minute of movie time doesn't mean a minute of time on screen. Movies often show days, months, or years happening for the characters. So there is time to develop a romance. And tvs and books have even less excuse. They can develop a romance, they are just choosing not to.

A romance genre doesn't mean the romance doesn't have to be or shouldn't be developed. Shouldn't that mean the opposite? If the romance is the theme and focus of the media, shouldn't developing it and making it believable be even more important?