case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2020-08-16 03:36 pm

[ SECRET POST #4972 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4972 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________


03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.























Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 39 secrets from Secret Submission Post #712.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: To you, what is necessary for a same-sex relationship to be considered canon?

(Anonymous) 2020-08-17 12:25 am (UTC)(link)
However, there are tons of m/f relationships that I didn't think were canon, only to then look at the fandom and official statements from writers that acted as if they were unambiguously canon and it was just a fact that anyone could tell clear as day from the text. So I have no idea what this "if it were m/f would it be obvious as canon" test is supposed to entail.