Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2020-08-16 03:36 pm
[ SECRET POST #4972 ]
⌈ Secret Post #4972 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 39 secrets from Secret Submission Post #712.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: To you, what is necessary for a same-sex relationship to be considered canon?
(Anonymous) 2020-08-17 02:10 am (UTC)(link)Re: To you, what is necessary for a same-sex relationship to be considered canon?
(Anonymous) 2020-08-17 03:59 pm (UTC)(link)I kind of get it to a certain degree. Like, my ships pretty much never become "canon" (except in specifically queer literature) because they're mostly m/m and that's just not really a thing in most mainstream shows (talking about TV here because that's my main medium for entertainment outside of books; I've just never been a big movie person for whatever reason). I'm trying to get past it, but I do still have this mindset of "it's just not the same if it's not canon". I think in my case it's because these days, I tend to get into smaller fandoms and rarepairs where there's not any fic, so it "being canon" seems more important because that's a way to get more content for the ship. I know in the past when I was in large fandoms where I shipped the most popular or second most popular ship and there was a ton of content, I didn't really care so much about whether "it was canon" or not.