case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2020-08-16 03:36 pm

[ SECRET POST #4972 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4972 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________


03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.























Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 39 secrets from Secret Submission Post #712.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: To you, what is necessary for a same-sex relationship to be considered canon?

(Anonymous) 2020-08-17 03:59 pm (UTC)(link)
OP of thread

I kind of get it to a certain degree. Like, my ships pretty much never become "canon" (except in specifically queer literature) because they're mostly m/m and that's just not really a thing in most mainstream shows (talking about TV here because that's my main medium for entertainment outside of books; I've just never been a big movie person for whatever reason). I'm trying to get past it, but I do still have this mindset of "it's just not the same if it's not canon". I think in my case it's because these days, I tend to get into smaller fandoms and rarepairs where there's not any fic, so it "being canon" seems more important because that's a way to get more content for the ship. I know in the past when I was in large fandoms where I shipped the most popular or second most popular ship and there was a ton of content, I didn't really care so much about whether "it was canon" or not.