[ SECRET POST #5008 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #5008 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________


03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 41 secrets from Secret Submission Post #717.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

But by that logic, anyone who wants a textually faithful adaptation of Rebecca should see the casting choices and realize that it's not going to be textually faithful in the way they want, right?

I just really don't understand the distinguishing line.

[(Anonymous)]

You mean, like OP did?

I'm not sure what your point is, tbh. I'm not unaware of how much Hollywood loves adaptations and how they're considered lower risk than original work. It's just that even with that being the unfortunate reality, my personal preference is to see more of this genre, but original work. I'm not saying stuff like Rebecca shouldn't be made because it's not 100% faithful. I'm saying that if people enjoy this genre, then maybe they'd enjoy original work in this genre and they wouldn't be disappointed because it doesn't measure up to expectations of faithfulness.

[(Anonymous)]

I think we agree on all of the main points!

As far as I can tell the only thing that we're still arguing about is specifically the Haunting of Hill House TV adaptation, because you used that as an example of a good original Gothic story, and it confused me because I don't understand the distinction between the Haunting of Hill House adaptation and the Rebecca adaptation. But other than that specific thing that confused me, I think we're mostly on the same page.

[(Anonymous)]

I'm sorry, I thought I made it clear. For me, the distinction is that The Haunting of Hill House never claimed to be a faithful adaptation of the book. I consider it "a good gothic story" in the sense that to me, it's hot people + gothic setting, per the original comment I was responding to. It might be very loosely based upon Shirley Jackson's novel, but it's different enough (quite different, in fact) that it feels like its own thing.

[(Anonymous)]

I suppose I understand where you're coming from! It just seems to me that the connection is pretty inescapable, and the expectation is always going to be that it's an adaptation, when the TV adaptation has the same title as the book.

[(Anonymous)]

Yep. Which is why it's helpful to do what the show did, and establish upfront that it's only loosely based on the novel. IIRC, Shirley Jackson wasn't mentioned in the trailer and the trailer is quite obviously not the same plot or characters as the novel, which helps even more.