case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2020-09-25 05:59 pm

[ SECRET POST #5012 ]


⌈ Secret Post #5012 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________


02.
[Warhammer 40,000]


__________________________________________________



03.
[INMOST]


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________












06. [SPOILERS for Mulan (2020)]



__________________________________________________



07. [WARNING for discussion of antisemitism]



__________________________________________________



07. [WARNING for discussion of child molestation/sexual assault]



__________________________________________________



09. [WARNING for discussion of sexual harassment]



__________________________________________________



10. [WARNING for discussion of abuse]



__________________________________________________



11. [WARNING for discussion of abuse]

[FAITH, The Council]




















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #717.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2020-09-25 11:19 pm (UTC)(link)
My problem is with critics who don't think their own criticism is ITSELF open to criticism. Criticism isn't magic. The author has every right to just flat-out disagree with it, and to fight back if it gets nasty. Some people see that as an attempt to shut down criticism. No, it isn't. It's disagreement, not silencing.

"I think your age gap ship is disgusting."

"Too bad. That's not my problem." <-- perfectly fair and legitimate response.