[ SECRFET POST #5023 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #5023 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________


03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 37 secrets from Secret Submission Post #719.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[greghousesgf]

It's disappointing to find that out about Ray Bradbury considering a) a lot of what he wrote wound up on TV in some form and b) the whole "books=good TV=bad" dichotomy is nonsense anyway. Plenty of bad books existed both before and after TV was invented.

[(Anonymous)]

I think his thesis was a bit more nuanced than described in the secret, or in most discussions about this for that matter.

[(Anonymous)]

SA: Fahrenheit 451 is not at all subtle in giving us multiple characters who serve as author proxies, who explain to Montag that the problem is about government censorship AND anti-intellectual commercialism AND oversensitive minorities expurgating books. I don't agree with some parts of the argument, but it's laid out explicitly on the page.