case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2020-10-10 03:29 pm

[ SECRET POST #5027 ]


⌈ Secret Post #5027 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________


03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 42 secrets from Secret Submission Post #719.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2020-10-10 11:18 pm (UTC)(link)
anon who replied below

Yes, exactly. I didn't mention it in my other reply to this thread since I haven't read it in long enough that I don't recall exactly what bothered me about the treatment of female characters, but that's the impression I had too. Like, if the "deconstruction" extends to every layer of the meta, it's... just kind of literally what it is, IMO? And this is coming from someone who liked the book overall, but had a hard time getting past that.