Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2008-12-27 04:54 pm
[ SECRET POST #722 ]
⌈ Secret Post #722 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
101.

__________________________________________________
102.

__________________________________________________
103.

[Death Note/The Dark Knight]
__________________________________________________
104.

__________________________________________________
105.

__________________________________________________
106.

__________________________________________________
107.

__________________________________________________
108.

__________________________________________________
109.

__________________________________________________
110.

__________________________________________________
111.

__________________________________________________
112.

__________________________________________________
113.

__________________________________________________
114.

[Axis Powers Hetalia]
__________________________________________________
115.

__________________________________________________
116.

__________________________________________________
117.

[Lucky Star OVA]
__________________________________________________
118.

__________________________________________________
119.

[Supernatural]
__________________________________________________
120.

__________________________________________________
121.

__________________________________________________
122.

__________________________________________________
123.

__________________________________________________
124.

__________________________________________________
125.

[The Monkees]
__________________________________________________
126.

[Dr Who]
__________________________________________________
127.

[Jason Mraz]
__________________________________________________
128.
__________________________________________________
129.

__________________________________________________
130.

__________________________________________________
131.

__________________________________________________
132.

__________________________________________________
133.

__________________________________________________
134.

__________________________________________________
135.

__________________________________________________
136.

__________________________________________________
137.

[South Park]
__________________________________________________
138.

__________________________________________________
139.

__________________________________________________
140.

[Final Fantasy VI]
__________________________________________________
141.

__________________________________________________
142.

__________________________________________________
143.

[SpongeBob SquarePants/Homestar Runner - Squilliam/Strong Bad]
__________________________________________________
144.

__________________________________________________
145.

__________________________________________________
146.

__________________________________________________
147.

__________________________________________________
148.

[Benny and Joon]
__________________________________________________
149.
__________________________________________________
150.

__________________________________________________
151.

[Starcraft]
__________________________________________________
152.

__________________________________________________
153.

__________________________________________________
154. [repeat]
__________________________________________________
155. [repeat]
__________________________________________________
156.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 16 pages, 382 secrets from Secret Submission Post #103.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 1 2 3 4 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 2 - too big ], [ 1 2 3 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

128 ( When did it start being "cool" not to give a shit?)
Sure, some people are going to be irritating about this, like people are irritating about every other thing that ever happens in fandom. But personally, I'd rather people be getting up in arms about something that's ACTUALLY IMPORTANT (ie Hollywood's seriously fucked up attitudes and policies regarding race) than continuing to fight over who Katara's going to sleep with.
I don't usually say things like this on FS, but seriously: Fuck off, OP. If you don't like it, filter your friends list and find something else to do for a while.
Re: 128 ( When did it start being "cool" not to give a shit?)
Re: 128 ( When did it start being "cool" not to give a shit?)
Re: 128 ( When did it start being "cool" not to give a shit?)
Re: 128 ( When did it start being "cool" not to give a shit?)
(Anonymous) 2008-12-27 10:59 pm (UTC)(link)Re: 128 ( When did it start being "cool" not to give a shit?)
Writing letters might not do anything.
Doing nothing will definitely not do anything.
Re: 128 ( When did it start being "cool" not to give a shit?)
(Anonymous) 2008-12-27 11:06 pm (UTC)(link)Re: 128 ( When did it start being "cool" not to give a shit?)
Re: 128 ( When did it start being "cool" not to give a shit?)
Think about it, what's more effective: Complaining annoymously to the people on the internet you've never met, thus giving the movie MORE publicity than it already has; or shutting up, pretending it doesn't exisit and not going to see it? At least with the second choice, you a) take money away from their box office gross, increasing the chance that they'll tank; and b) don't give them any more attention than they already have, which means that less people will be inclined or tempted to see it, also decreasing their box office gross.
Seriously, talk is cheap, and the only thing that Hollywood types understand is money.
Re: 128 ( When did it start being "cool" not to give a shit?)
Silence is pretty much the least useful thing that anyone can do, actually!
Re: 128 ( When did it start being "cool" not to give a shit?)
Re: 128 ( When did it start being "cool" not to give a shit?)
Re: 128 ( When did it start being "cool" not to give a shit?)
It's a small thing, but it's still something. Anything that keeps people talking about it and thinking about it is good, even if some ways of doing so are more immediately helpful than others.
Re: 128 ( When did it start being "cool" not to give a shit?)
Re: 128 ( When did it start being "cool" not to give a shit?)
(Anonymous) 2008-12-27 11:37 pm (UTC)(link)And like other people said, this is a huge campaign, not a few people talking about it here and there.
Re: 128 ( When did it start being "cool" not to give a shit?)
Re: 128 ( When did it start being "cool" not to give a shit?)
Re: 128 ( When did it start being "cool" not to give a shit?)
So even pretending for a moment that LJ posts can't really raise any awareness, they're still not useless, and even if they were, what people say in their own personal journals is their own business. People who don't like it are, I'm sure, free to scroll past, filter them, defriend them, or ignore them. In the end, you're defending someone who's being a whiny entitled douche, because how dare people write in their own journals about things the OP doesn't want to read about anymore? Or how dare they have their own posts in fandom communities where they can talk about these things together? How dare they care so much about something s/he is perfectly happy being complicit with?
Re: 128 ( When did it start being "cool" not to give a shit?)
Re: 128 ( When did it start being "cool" not to give a shit?)
(Anonymous) - 2009-01-05 05:40 (UTC) - ExpandRe: 128 ( When did it start being "cool" not to give a shit?)
(Anonymous) - 2008-12-28 04:19 (UTC) - ExpandRe: 128 ( When did it start being "cool" not to give a shit?)
The first choice that's more effective. The second way the movie tanks for no reason anyone knows, and the studio assumes it's because fantasy's on the way out or something. Or maybe they figure the problem was they didn't have more teenybopper stars in it. Certainly not that anybody cared that they made all the characters white.
The first way it's known that people who were interested in the movie to begin with are offended by the whitewashing, there's an actual discussion about whitewashing somewhere (as opposed to it being done a lot and nobody cares), AND when people don't go to see the movie that's known as a possible reason for it.
I really don't think talking about how the cast is white is going to be tempting too many people to go see the movie or that that kind of attention is going to help them. There's no reason to assume that somebody who talks about the problem on the Internet will then go see the movie, while somebody who couldn't care less if the characters are white (or justifies it on the Internet) will stay home.
Re: 128 ( When did it start being "cool" not to give a shit?)
What about the people who've never heard of Avatar, who decide to go see the movie because they want to see what everybody's shitting themselves over? What about the people who weren't going to see the movie, but decide to do it for the lulz, like with Twilight? What about the people who would actually prefer the movie to be completely white (coughStormFrontbastardscough) and support it because of that?
Indirected ranting does no good. DIRECTED complaints, on the other hand, do wonders. Big difference.
Re: 128 ( When did it start being "cool" not to give a shit?)
(Anonymous) - 2008-12-27 23:30 (UTC) - ExpandRe: 128 ( When did it start being "cool" not to give a shit?)
Re: 128 ( When did it start being "cool" not to give a shit?)
Re: 128 ( When did it start being "cool" not to give a shit?)
(Anonymous) - 2008-12-27 23:36 (UTC) - ExpandRe: 128 ( When did it start being "cool" not to give a shit?)
(Anonymous) - 2008-12-28 12:21 (UTC) - ExpandRe: 128 ( When did it start being "cool" not to give a shit?)
Complaining =/= giving Hollywood money, that's a huge fallacy. And sitting idly by while something offensive gets done and NOT saying anything and assuming that will keep people from giving money to the movie of a hugely popular television series is irresponsible and lazy, not a smart way of boycotting. Boycotts need to be vocal to mean anything. And yes, when they're vocal, they give attention to whatever it is they're boycotting - but that doesn't automatically mean it's the good kind of attention. That's all dependent on the people reacting to the boycott and the letter writing and the spreading awareness, and how THEY behave from there. Not on the people who have made the effort to spread awareness about something they find horrifying. Really, all they can do is be as convincing as possible, and from there, the reaction is out of their hands.
...
Re: ...
Re: 128 ( When did it start being "cool" not to give a shit?)
NOT ALL ATTENTION IS GOOD ATTENTION. Especially when there's loads and loads of cash concerned.
I'm willing to bet that the bad attention fandom is giving this movie is going to do more good than ignoring it ever will. Hell, just about ANYTHING does more good than looking away when something bad is happening.
Re: 128 ( When did it start being "cool" not to give a shit?)
(Anonymous) 2008-12-28 10:59 am (UTC)(link)Re: 128 ( When did it start being "cool" not to give a shit?)
Re: 128 ( When did it start being "cool" not to give a shit?)
Re: 128 ( When did it start being "cool" not to give a shit?)
Just fyi.
Re: 128 ( When did it start being "cool" not to give a shit?)
OP, you're a twat. STFU.