[ SECRET POST #5044 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #5044 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________


03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 31 secrets from Secret Submission Post #722.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

For me, there's a distinction here.

On the one hand, you have times where there's something that's not explicitly stated in the text, but that is deducible from the text. Or times where there's just ambiguity about what's really going on and you have to put your own interpretation on events. I really like this kind of thing! I think it's a fun game to put the puzzle pieces together and I like reading things that require that work of interpretation and thought.

On the other hand, you have times where the writer just doesn't tell you shit about what's going on and then reveals it like a secret later, and I totally agree that's BS. If it's not in the text, or deducible in the text, then it's BS. That's the dividing line for me.