Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2020-10-30 06:34 pm
[ SECRET POST #5047 ]
⌈ Secret Post #5047 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08. https://i.imgur.com/buBIH04.png
[The Outlaw King, OP marked NSFW: full frontal male nudity, female topless nudity]
__________________________________________________
09.

[OP marked NSFW (fanart)]
__________________________________________________
10.

[Their Eyes Were Watching God]
__________________________________________________
11. [SPOILERS for Raging Loop]

__________________________________________________
12. [SPOILERS for Cursed]

__________________________________________________
13. [SPOILERS for The Haunting of Bly Manor]

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #722.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Transcript by OP
Not because the site culture is bigoted and backwards like some people like to believe. (It's far from perfect, but they're *trying*.)
(Though, yes, there is a group of TLP lurkers that just downvote every queer-related draft without exception. Fuck those users in particular. But the people who actually talk are nice.)
It's because people don't *want* LGBT tropes. They want "list of good LGBT representation". And good representation, by definition, avoids being tropey.
One of the cuts people are complaining *most* about was a trope literally defined as "character is bi, but it's not important to anything"!
s!b nobody here, there, or anywhere wants to hear my cynical-ass whining
b!s can the admins of this site do LITERALLY SOMETHING about the years-old bugs in discussion pages, PLEASE?????