case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2020-12-05 03:20 pm

[ SECRET POST #5083 ]


⌈ Secret Post #5083 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________


03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 48 secrets from Secret Submission Post #728.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2020-12-06 12:25 pm (UTC)(link)
As far as I'm concerned, Star Trek has always been better suited for a series format, but doesn't have the flashiness(?) to make for good movies (although some of the movies are far better than any of the Star Wars movies), while Star Wars has always been better suited for a self-contained movie [trilogy] format but doesn't have the foundation or depth to sustain a long-term TV-style series. They both have their pros and their cons, their strengths and their flaws, but they are entirely different storytelling and world-building strategies, so really it doesn't make sense that they are constantly compared as if you can only truly like one or the other.