Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2021-01-05 04:29 pm
[ SECRET POST #5114 ]
⌈ Secret Post #5114 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 24 secrets from Secret Submission Post #732.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-01-06 01:03 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-01-06 01:06 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-01-06 01:18 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-01-06 01:24 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-01-06 01:30 am (UTC)(link)It is true that Missouri is aggressively conservative and Trump-y but that's not the same thing
no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-01-06 01:40 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-01-06 01:42 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-01-06 02:17 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-01-06 02:40 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-01-06 03:05 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-01-06 03:29 am (UTC)(link)I feel like saying that something is true "by defintion" is often not a very good argument, since definitions are basically arbitrary and conventional.
In this case, it is literally true that "cracker" is an insult based on racial identity, so in that sense, it is literally correct to say that "cracker" is a racial slur. But talking about racial slurs brings to mind a lot of weight and baggage that is not included in the literal definition of a racial slur. We have certain moral and political judgments that we associate with the term racial slur, stemming ultimately from the fact that racial slurs are used as linguistic tools to entrench and police racial boundaries in society and systems of prejudice and oppression. Those kinds of judgments are essential to the argument that's being made - "The anon who said 'cracker' is using a racial slur; people who use racial slurs are morons; therefore, anon is a moron."
But those moral and societal judgments don't actually necessarily apply in the case of "cracker", because even though it is literally a racial slur, it is not used to entrench or police systems of racial prejudice and oppression in the same way as other racial slurs. (I guess you could make the argument that "cracker" as a phrase for specifically poor whites is classist, but that's clearly not the argument at hand here). So in fact, even though it's literally true that "cracker" is a racial slur, the implied argument doesn't really make sense.
(Of course, that doesn't mean that the anon who originally said "cracker" is right, either. They're just wrong for other reasons - if they're saying that Missouri is uniquely racist because of Ferguson, they've apparently forgotten about good ol' liberal Minneapolis and George Floyd)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-01-06 08:05 am (UTC)(link)Stopped reading here because you proved my point for me. It cuts two ways.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-01-06 04:53 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-01-06 05:02 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-01-06 08:51 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-01-06 07:46 am (UTC)(link)