Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2021-01-29 07:56 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
[ SECRET POST #5138 ]
⌈ Secret Post #5138 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02. [SPOILERS for Queen's Gambit]

__________________________________________________
03. [WARNING for mention of animal death]

[Doug]
__________________________________________________
04. [WARNING for mention of rape]

__________________________________________________
05. [WARNING for discussion of sexual harassment/rape fantasies]

__________________________________________________
06. [WARNING for mention of child grooming]

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #735.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-01-31 03:56 am (UTC)(link)That's why, at the very least, I would like people to always use literal language when they describe something that happened on a show. "Willow roofied Tara" may mean the exact same thing to you as "Willow put a spell on Tara to make her forget they were arguing and then had sex with her" but it makes all the difference as to how I choose to view it and how well I'd be able to assess whether I can handle watching a show where this happens. At the very least, have some consideration for other people's triggers. (Not you, AYRT; the people you're replying to.)