Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2021-02-15 06:03 pm
[ SECRET POST #5155 ]
⌈ Secret Post #5155 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 24 secrets from Secret Submission Post #738.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-02-15 11:57 pm (UTC)(link)Also, the Vorkosigan books are rock-solid starting from The Vor Game (I like the earlier books too but I consider the Miles series to begin with The Vor Game) (and definitely better than David Weber) if you're not into it by then you probably never will be
no subject
no subject
One of the commenters below had what I think is a good review of what she (and I) think makes the Vorkosiverse good storytelling. And I do tend to agree with people who say that Bujold's writing is pretty damned good.
Reading is, as others have said, a very subjective thing. If you've tried Vorkosigan books and can't get into them, then you can't get into them. That's taste.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-02-16 01:22 pm (UTC)(link)WELL NOW GET READY FOR THE HOTTEST NEW TREND
THROWING YOUR YUM TO THE GROUND, STOMPING ON IT, SPITTING ON WHAT'S LEFT OVER THEN POINTING AT YOUR YUM AND ASKING IF YOU GET WHAT YOU DID WRONG.
Coming to a pscyhe near you, Summer 2021
no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-02-15 11:59 pm (UTC)(link)Maybe they haven't read any other books in thus specific niche and want a friend to share it with?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-02-16 12:16 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-02-16 12:32 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-02-16 12:35 am (UTC)(link)Then again, I'm not really a huge fan of political scifi partially because of that aspect of Weber's books.
On the other hand, I haven't read the other series, so, I can't comment. Despite favoring female authors, for some weird reason Bujold never actually hit my radar. Maybe it wasn't in the teeny tiny library near where I lived. Huh.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-02-16 12:38 am (UTC)(link)I will say that I do find the Harrington series easier to read, personally. They’re drier and tighter and move better for me (I realise this is entirely personal and will depend a lot on your ability to roll with mil-sf technobabble, since Harrington is much heavier on that than Vorkosigan).
For Vorkosigan, my favourite parts are actually the early books, as in the Cordelia & Aral duology, and then select parts of the later books, and when I focus in I do realise that they’re basically the books that focus on Barrayar as a nation and a character in and of itself. Barrayar is incredible as a character, and its shift from an agonised nation of broken oaths and desperate honour to a more healed, functional society over the course of Aral and then Gregor’s reigns is the best arc.
It’s actually similar to the feeling I get from Haven in Harrington, despite them being incredibly different forms of government. But the feeling I get from Aral and Simon and Cordelia is very much the same feeling I get from Theisman and Eloise and Warner Caslet. Decent people stuck in the horrifying machinery of empire and struggling to keep that decency and still survive. They echo quite nicely to each other.
Vorkosigan is generally better at the oomph, the grand operatic emotions, the manic struggles and personal tragedies. Harrington is better at the slow, stark etching out of a struggle, the big looming forces and tightening political nets. It feels tighter and more deliberate than Vorkosigan, though it does get in some amazing (and often horrifying) lightning-bolts of emotion.
But I’m not really much help here, because I love them both. If you can’t stand Miles, Vorkosigan will be difficult for you. If you get bogged down in a lot of made-up military terminology, Harrington will be such a slog. It depends on your personal preferences and tolerances.
But I will forgive a LOT for Simon Illyan, Cordelia Naismith, Aral Vorkosigan, and the entirety of ‘Captain Vorpatril’s Alliance’, which is a book without peer but unfortunately requires having read the rest of the series to understand. For Vorkosigan, if you’re anything like me, start with the first two Miles books, ‘Warrior’s Apprentice’ and ‘The Vor Game’, just to get an idea of what the series started from and where it wants to go, allowing for them being the weakest of the books, and THEN go and read ‘Shards of Honor’ and ‘Barrayar’ instead. They’re the prequel duology with Miles’ parents, and they dump you straight in on the good old horrific old days of Barrayar, and set you up much better for the slow steady victory that is the rest of the Miles books afterwards.
For Harrington … part of the difficulty with Harrington is that it kind of does need to be read in order, and by the time you get up to all the interlocking subseries in the latter end of things, it’s hard to keep up with. The early books up to about … honestly, until ‘In Enemy Hands’, really are a bit of a slog. They have flashes of brilliance (Warner Caslet), but they’re slow and bogged down in following Hornblower’s lead. After that, though, they explode, and I do love both the Zilwicki & Cachat subseries and the Talbott Cluster subseries as well. Probably more than the main one, in the latter case. Honestly, it might not even hurt to jump in on Talbott with ‘The Shadow of Saganami’ to get a semi-self-contained idea of what the later books feel like, and then go back to the main series.
They’re both great series, though. For a lot of the same reasons, even. If you like tortured honour, decent people stuck in horrifying situations and staying decent anyway, the slow and painful reformation of corrupt systems, and some incredibly operatic emotional struggles along the way, either of them will do you. Take your pick based on personal preference!
no subject
So, uhm, just dropped by to say that.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-02-16 01:29 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-02-16 01:32 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-02-16 02:59 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-02-16 04:16 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-02-16 06:03 am (UTC)(link)no subject