case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2021-02-16 05:58 pm

[ SECRET POST #5156 ]


⌈ Secret Post #5156 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________


03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 24 secrets from Secret Submission Post #738.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
philstar22: (Default)

[personal profile] philstar22 2021-02-16 11:28 pm (UTC)(link)
If that's what does it for you, that's what does it for you. To me that's really boring and samey and would get old really fast. But enjoy what you enjoy. That's what smut is there for.

NSFW talk

(Anonymous) 2021-02-16 11:43 pm (UTC)(link)
I prefer a little bit more variety, but one of my pet peeves is when authors act like vaginas have the same design flaws as penises. Like, no, I'm not going to be completely wrung out after one orgasm, in fact I tend to find later ones better. It's lazy smut writing and genuinely kinda annoys me lmao
philstar22: (Default)

Re: NSFW talk

[personal profile] philstar22 2021-02-17 12:07 am (UTC)(link)
True. But also, fandoms with magic can be inventive and work around that particular "design flaw." I've written a few that way. Magic is fun. And plus, other species' penises might not work the same as humans and might not have that same flaw.

Re: NSFW talk

(Anonymous) 2021-02-18 09:09 am (UTC)(link)
Honestly, my pet peeve is the opposite - authors who seem to think all people with penises can have multiple orgasms in a row without any sort of refractory period.

(Anonymous) 2021-02-16 11:45 pm (UTC)(link)
Yep! I'll read other types of smut, but that setup really does it for me, too.

(Anonymous) 2021-02-16 11:48 pm (UTC)(link)
I like this formula, too, though I think I actually prefer "bottom comes while dry humping, then comes again while getting fucked," or, "Bottom gets so excited they come while giving head to top, then come again while getting fucked."

That said, now that I have a ship where I can justify the bottom having zero refractory period (due to altered genetics), my favorite thing is more like, "Bottom has hair trigger; comes while dry humping; comes again while giving head to top; comes again while being prepped; comes a couple of times while being fucked."

(Anonymous) 2021-02-17 02:10 am (UTC)(link)
I LOVE that whole sequence of bottom-with-a-hair-trigger multiple orgasms, though for me I mostly find it works with ships where I'm writing the bottom as a trans guy (but this is admittedly blatant author appeal for the trans guy writing the spoiled bottom getting all the orgasms).

Although... magic, altered genetics, psychic sex, and dry orgasms are all also good in my book. My brand tends to be 'service top Dom gets off on providing submissive bottom with Too Many Orgasms' where smut is concerned.

(Anonymous) 2021-02-17 02:34 am (UTC)(link)
My brand tends to be 'service top Dom gets off on providing submissive bottom with Too Many Orgasms' where smut is concerned.

Unf, yes, we absolutely have the same brand. This is 3000% my jam.

And hell yes, nonny, get that blatant author appeal!

(Anonymous) 2021-02-17 06:48 pm (UTC)(link)
Ohh, please tell me your fandom is the Witcher. What your describing is right up my alley and I would LOVE to read that in my current fandom.

(Anonymous) 2021-02-18 12:07 am (UTC)(link)
Heh. My fandom is Starker. Sooo. I mean, if you still wanted recs, I'd give you recs. But my guess is you don't.
mishey22: (Default)

[personal profile] mishey22 2021-02-16 11:51 pm (UTC)(link)
Whatever gets you going, nonny. I feel like it'd get repetitive for me, though

(Anonymous) 2021-02-16 11:55 pm (UTC)(link)
As long as you enjoy it, OP, that’s all that matters.

(Anonymous) 2021-02-17 12:26 am (UTC)(link)
I'm variable with whatever the writer wants to do pre-penetration, so long as they don't go in immediately(or dry in the case of m/m), but I am 100% with you on the bottom getting off twice. Absolutely my jam.

(Anonymous) 2021-02-17 11:14 pm (UTC)(link)
It seems like this is pretty common in fic and a lot of romance novels.