[ SECRET POST #5184 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #5184 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________


03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 25 secrets from Secret Submission Post #742.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Maybe they like power dynamics that are removed from ones that relate to them as a person?

[(Anonymous)]

You'd think they'd lay off the stereotypical feminization of "bottoms" then... (and I don't mean in porn, like whatever you want in porn!)

[(Anonymous)]

NAYRT - I suspect it's a goldilocks thing. You (figurative) need a certain amount of distance from the text in order to not feel confronted by it personally, but you also want it to be relatable in order to achieve maximum vicarious enjoyment. For some people, feminizing the bottom heightens the vicarious enjoyment without forcing them to confront how the fic relates to them and their lived experience. I'm not majorly into feminization, but it makes sense to me.

[(Anonymous)]

I don't know what to tell you if you don't understand why anyone would see a big difference between a male character stuck in a stereotypical feminine role and a female character stuck in a stereotypical feminine role.

[(Anonymous)]

still homophobic bruh, but getting m/m fans to understand this is like talking to a brick wall.

[(Anonymous)]

I'm not saying it's different, I'm saying it probably helps with the cognitive dissociation.