case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2021-03-31 05:31 pm
  • Add Memory
  • Share This Entry

[ SECRET POST #5199 ]


⌈ Secret Post #5199 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________


03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 31 secrets from Secret Submission Post #744.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

(Anonymous) 2021-03-31 10:57 pm (UTC)(link)
I read this book in 11th or 12th grade with personal interest because I was in the only English section in my year that didn't read it. 100% overhyped. I'm over 20 years older now and even more annoyed that this literal child was set free in a city to do whatever he wanted. Different times, maybe, but Holden really is just a little shit.

(Anonymous) 2021-03-31 11:03 pm (UTC)(link)
Okay, I don't get it, isn't he 16? Is it really unbelievable that he could go AWOL in the city for a bit? It's been ages since I read this but doesn't this book have one of those A Craaaaazy Night plots? Why is this of all things such a sticking point for you AND the OP?

(Anonymous) 2021-04-01 01:44 am (UTC)(link)
I mean, you might not like Holden, but he's 16 in the late 1940s. 17 year olds had just been engaged in WW2.

(Anonymous) 2021-04-01 03:04 am (UTC)(link)
Wait, wait, wait—which is it? Because if he's a literal child, then he is not responsible for his behavior, and thus cannot be a little shit.

(Anonymous) 2021-04-01 07:25 pm (UTC)(link)
Excuse me? Amyone under 18 cannot be responsible for their own behaviour? What utter tosh.

(Anonymous) 2021-04-01 09:08 pm (UTC)(link)
JFC you're pathetic.
Flat | Top-Level Comments Only