case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2021-04-12 04:07 pm

[ SECRET POST #5211 ]


⌈ Secret Post #5211 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________


03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 27 secrets from Secret Submission Post #746.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Inspired by Secret #1

(Anonymous) 2021-04-13 12:57 am (UTC)(link)
Two things:

1: No actual recognizable expression of emotion when there logically should be (accounting for character personality, some are more stoic than others), or alternately such blatant displays of specific emotion ("Look, I'm HAPPY! Now I'm ANGRY!") without any sort of nuance that it looks like a parody of that emotion. (This is the flip side of how I recognize good acting - if someone can actually convey a combination of several different emotional reactions that a character might be having at the moment, like I can tell the difference in the course of an argument from when a character is angry to when they become simply frustrated.)

2: Recognizable expressions of emotion and such, but the same personality and mannerisms in every freaking role, and then you see them in an interview and oh guess what, that's just them, they're not acting at all.