[ SECRET POST #5213 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #5213 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________


03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 15 secrets from Secret Submission Post #746.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

another random DA fan here, and this is the side that I'm on, most games-- the institution of the Templars itself is ripe for awful, terrible abuses that absolutely do happen, but that doesn't negate the fact that when it comes to mage training some kind of institution is necessary?

and we have canonical examples of places that have happy, functioning mages without the militant asshole Templars you get in Fereldan and Orlais-- like the Avaar, the Dalish, Rivain... (not bringing up Tevinter because of the uhhhhhh slavery and the fact that we haven't seen it as a location in a game yet so we can't know first-hand how it functions with neutered templars)

I feel like the games go out of their way to paint siding with Templars as Always The Bad Choice and mages as Always The Good Choice but they also have a lot of garden-variety abominations and power-hungry mages who are really evil villains?? It feels like a lot of mixed signals in a "not all of the people writing this game were on the same pages" way, and I wish it were more coherent.

I'd love to be able to side with templars in any way that matters without the game painting it as the Worst Possible Timeline.