[ SECRET POST #5224 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #5224 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________


03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.







Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 34 secrets from Secret Submission Post #748.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Things you wish websites you love would change.

[(Anonymous)]

I'm the anon who loves descriptive tagging, but I will agree that it can get off-putting depending on how it's done. If it's really tryhard about being cute/chummy/quirky, that can be kind of off-putting (though I've read plenty of well-written, enjoyable fanfic with funny, chummy tags, so it's by no means a dealbreaker for me). And, of course, if it's a wall of tags I think most people find that off-putting. But there is a lot of room in the middle between minimalist restricted tagging and wall of tags.

Personally I just find people's tags useful about a hundred times more often than I find them annoying. And as a writer I love them because I love being able to warn for things specifically. I don't have to sit there going, "Should I use a noncon tag because of this extremely minor thing that could nonetheless ping someone's noncon squick/trigger?" I can just use a specific tag. Or I can tag noncon and then add more tags that clarify why the noncon tag is in use.