[ SECRET POST #5224 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #5224 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________


03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.







Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 34 secrets from Secret Submission Post #748.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Things you wish websites you love would change.

[meadowphoenix]

I want to say I'm actually ok with chaos. As it exists now, you can edit posts and have reblogs of the pre-edited posts. Considering any social function, that's already chaos. But, I would be okay with [post deleted] in the place of content for any reblogs, which preserved reblogged replies. There are just a ton of issues with even suggesting people have any kind of ownership over pictures they did not take (which for scrapbooking purposes is in fact the issue) that, yeah...I would choose chaos.

Re: Things you wish websites you love would change.

[(Anonymous)]

It's not about ownership. Nobody is suggesting that reblogging something gives you ownership over it. This is about the fact that people want to be able to preserve and revisit things on the internet they like, and if you don't give people a way to revisit those things they like in the location you've uploaded them to, people will copy your content to another location in order to preserve it. They will do that and nothing you do will stop them from doing it.

As long as people have the reassurance that the stuff they like isn't going to disappear over night, most of them will be content to reblog your original post (which most content creators want). But if you deny people that reassurance, they will take it upon themselves to store a copy of your content somewhere else. Who owns it or has the right to do what with it is irrelevant. I mean, if you want to amuse yourself with thinking about the ethics that's your choice, but it's irrelevant to the practical issue of what people will do.

Re: Things you wish websites you love would change.

[meadowphoenix]

lmao they DON'T have that assurance, tho, "you have no control over how we make or break content" is how social media operates, to a one, especially one like tumblr that has changed a million private corp hands. there's no reason not to believe that people aren't ALREADY doing this because of how easy it is to "lose" stuff even on tumblr and how difficult search and tags are. And storing on other sites, which are equally likely to change how content is hosted won't solve that! Hard drives will, but even in the early days of internet hosting that wasn't popular. So chaos is fine!

This isn't ethics btw, i'm talking law.