[ SECRET POST #5227 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #5227 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________


03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.







Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 13 secrets from Secret Submission Post #748.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

da OP

[(Anonymous)]

If Japanese mangaka are so afraid of adult women that they retreat to sexualizing lolis, then yes, I will keep pointing out that "holy fuck Japanese society is sexist". Here's a panty shot of a 7 year-old. U-uwaa?! Kyaaa! Ahegao. If they don't care about me calling them creepy and saying their writing sucks for including pantyshots of children, then don't worry about it. There's a point to be made though about how certain people in the English-language fandom jump to defend the gross parts of an anime when it's not that deep, and how fanservice of children and casual sexual assault of women cheapens whatever "no no, look my story is so deep and meaningful" wallpaper of a plot it has going on. Just cut the excuses, call it a hentai, and enjoy your loli rape porn in peace, you mangaka. If you submit it for critical review however, then be prepared for critical opinions.

Those are my opinions to mangaka who keep putting pantyshots of 7 year olds. To F!S, agree to disagree. I will always be boggled when grown-ass men lust over anime children. Catharsis is simply laughing at it, rather than think any deeper about it reflects sentiments found in Japanese misogyny.