[ SECRET POST #5229 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #5229 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________


03. https://i.imgur.com/uhxEF9T.jpg
[OP warned for NSFW image, illustrated sexual positions]


__________________________________________________

















04. [WARNING for discussion of abuse]



__________________________________________________



05. [WARNING for discussion of rape]



__________________________________________________



06. [WARNING for discussion of abuse]

[Persona 5 Strikers]


















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #748.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[case]

Name the fandom. And repeats, etc.

(If you think something in this thread is a troll, please ignore it! Conversation is fine, but OT wank makes stuff harder to keep track of in this thread. Thanks.)

[fscom]

DAILY LINKS:

General comments → Off-topic discussion thread

Games thread → Thread for games/memes/etc.

[fscom]

01. https://i.imgur.com/ru2ioGX.jpg

[fscom]

02. https://i.imgur.com/3kL4ArL.jpg

[fscom]

03. https://i.imgur.com/uhxEF9T.jpg
[OP warned for NSFW image, illustrated sexual positions]

[fscom]

04. [WARNING for discussion of abuse]
https://i.imgur.com/9PI3oFV.png

[fscom]

05. [WARNING for discussion of rape]
https://i.imgur.com/6PKSjBR.png

[fscom]

06. [WARNING for discussion of abuse]
https://i.imgur.com/xLrhg4B.png
[Persona 5 Strikers]

[fscom]

NS, NF, etc.

[fscom]

Official advertise your fandom-related event thread.

RULES FOR THIS:
1. NO images bigger than 600x600 in either direction (banners, et cetera).
2. ONE POST PER USER under this thread.
3. What IS allowed: roleplay advertisements, fandom comms, fandom events, things like that.
4. What is NOT allowed: anything for profit, any kind of fic/art commissions, seeking 1-on-1 RP, that kind of thing.

[fscom]

Official clickables thread.

RULES FOR THIS:
1. NO huge images or columns of images that require scrolling, please.
2. ONE POST PER USER under in this thread.
3. If you're going to post, try to at least help the others.

[fscom]

(If the thread contains spoilery/triggery content please warn/post as 2nd comment so it collapses!
Please collapse images, too!)

[fscom]

Games thread!

Transcript by OP

[fscom]

I hate that Doctor Who fans constantly hate on the current showrunner. First it was Moffat, now it's Chibnall. I thought Moffat was the worst show-runner of all time and now y'all miss him?

Transcript by OP

[fscom]

I have a deep and probably unfair grudge against Madeline Miller due to the fact that her book has been latched onto by the migratory slash fandom, which, unsatisfied with merely being irritating about their new fave, has created a fun conspiracy theory to amuse themselves, all about how "historians" are obsessed with HIDING THE TRUTH about A&P being and item and how this just PROVES that all historians, indeed, all of academia, has as its One True Goal the denial and annihilation of all depictions of queer people in any historical document ever. This would be stupid and inaccurate enough if they stuck to talking about A&P, but these fools have shared the love enough that I see other FICTIONAL CHARACTERS being claimed as victims of le homophobic historians. First: that's not how this works, that's not how any of this works. Second: None of you people know the first thing about either historical or literary analysis, especially of really old documents, which is painfully obvious given some of your stunningly idiotic takes. You're woefully, blatantly ignorant about ancient Greece: you don't get to pretend that historians (a growing percentage of whom are queer themselves, and who are the ones responsible for you even being aware that queer historical people existed) are the ignorant ones just because you read some published fanfic.

Friday secret count

[case]

~40

[(Anonymous)]

I don't think Chibnall is a good show runner, but I thought Moffat was worse and certainly don't want him back. I hope this helps alleviate your confusion!

[(Anonymous)]

I think that’s been a tradition dating back to Classic Who. I personally don’t have a favorite showrunner and I wouldn’t be able to tell you which one’s better. They’ve all had episodes I’ve liked and episodes I haven’t liked (and everything I don’t like, I just retcon in my mind).

[(Anonymous)]

Ehhhhhhhhhhhhhh

[feotakahari]

Actual Moffat quote:

“The other day I had to BEG a meeting with [BBC1 controller] Jay Hunt, just so I could explain what we're spending all her money on in Doctor Who. She said it all sounded very nice and sent me off to play.

That's more than creative freedom, that's being turned loose in the wild. Frankly, I'm scared and want someone to tell me what to do. I might even have an epiphany.”

So maybe the problem isn’t the showrunners; it’s the folks who’re supposed to be running the showrunners.

[(Anonymous)]

Frankly, that's a bullshit excuse. Writing and producing Doctor Who is the showrunner's job. The executives above the showrunner may well do a bad job at managing the showrunner. But if the showrunner did a shitty job, they did a shitty job.

Weekend Plans?

[kaijinscendre]

What is everyone doing this weekend?

Tomorrow I have to thin out my green bean plants. All the seeds have germinated and are looking cute. Other than that, should not have anything to do.

[feotakahari]

This was the joke behind that Dan Harmon “What if Dexter was a serial rapist instead of a serial killer?” sketch that offended the hell out of everyone.

On that note, I would love to see someone argue that shows where police beat up suspects in custody are intentionally eroticizing the violence. It makes as much sense as that “slasher movies are about gay sex” argument that goes around sometimes.

[(Anonymous)]

I mean

Surely whether or not a show is etoticizing violence is a question you can only answer by actually looking at the specific show in question? This is something that seems like it comes down to cases. There are absolutely slasher movies that have an erotic dimension, and slasher movies that don't.

[feotakahari]

I think you could get some real trolling potential by comparing “advocates to protect fictional characters because fictional characters can’t tell them to shut up” to “advocates against abortion because fetuses can’t tell them to shut up.”