case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2021-05-09 05:59 pm

[ SECRET POST #5238 ]


⌈ Secret Post #5238 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________


03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.







Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 37 secrets from Secret Submission Post #750.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2021-05-10 04:53 am (UTC)(link)
I mean, I agree with what you've said here, but the movie set things up in a dumb way and the Accords were poorly written and under the supervision of the US military (in the person of General Ross, who had already conducted some really bad decisions related to the Hulk). Do I think Accords of some kind (including mandatory training for Avengers and non-US oversight) would be a great idea? HELL YES. Do I think that's what was in the Sokovia Accords? No.

(Anonymous) 2021-05-10 06:30 am (UTC)(link)
+1000

Also, something that the movie made quite obvious, but that a surprising number of viewers seem to have missed, is that Tony's support for the Accords is basically, "We should operate under oversight, and if sometime in the future we don't like what they're telling us, we can just renege on our agreement." Whereas Cap's position is, "I don't trust the oversight mechanism, so I'm not going to enter into an agreement that I'll then have to abide by."