case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2021-05-12 06:54 pm

[ SECRET POST #5241 ]


⌈ Secret Post #5241 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________


03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.







Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 16 secrets from Secret Submission Post #750.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2021-05-13 06:40 am (UTC)(link)
Linking this here in case you didn't see it -

https://fandomsecrets.dreamwidth.org/2409735.html?thread=1066954759#cmt1066954759

(frozen comment)

[personal profile] fscom 2021-05-12 10:57 pm (UTC)(link)
DAILY LINKS:

General comments
Off-topic discussion thread


Games threadThread for games/memes/etc.
Edited 2021-05-12 23:00 (UTC)

(Anonymous) 2021-05-12 11:10 pm (UTC)(link)
Screwball comedy, basically.

The other type is more similar to enemy-to-lovers.

+1

(Anonymous) - 2021-05-12 23:14 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-05-13 00:14 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2021-05-12 11:29 pm (UTC)(link)
I feel this secret.

I think in alot of ways the writers that don't understand this is due to them thinking there has to be 'a winner' to the arguing / bantering.
sparklywalls: (Default)

[personal profile] sparklywalls 2021-05-12 11:31 pm (UTC)(link)
I think the line for me with this is I'm turned off if I get "he's just pulling your hair because he likes you!" vibes whereas one of the reasons Benedict/Beatrice works for me is that I got the sense that their arguing was a turn on for both of them, they were just holding off admitting it and it never really gets portrayed as malicious.

I hate "he's mean because he secretly likes you" but am open to "this person winds you up like nothing else but both of you find it attractive on some level" - I don't know if I'm explaning it well, but there's definitely a distinction for me so I get you OP.

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-05-12 23:40 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] sparklywalls - 2021-05-12 23:45 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-05-13 04:05 (UTC) - Expand
tabaqui: (Default)

[personal profile] tabaqui 2021-05-13 12:13 am (UTC)(link)
Agree - quick, witty banter where they're both enjoying themselves, and nobody is being put down or belittled is *fun*. Nasty snarking that is mostly low blows and ugly little jibes is *not* fun.

(Anonymous) 2021-05-13 12:19 am (UTC)(link)
I don't know, I rewatched the Empire Strikes Back and the sudden kiss while in Hoth came across as creepy

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-05-13 02:39 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-05-13 02:44 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-05-13 02:46 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-05-13 06:54 (UTC) - Expand

AYRT

(Anonymous) - 2021-05-13 03:27 (UTC) - Expand

Re: AYRT

(Anonymous) - 2021-05-13 04:13 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2021-05-13 02:20 am (UTC)(link)
I feel like there's numerous ways to do a pairing that fights/bickers constantly. But it's definitely better if the writer understands which type they're writing. I mean, there's the enemies-to-lovers version, where the fighting can (and probably should) be quite harsh, at least in the beginning.

Then there's the "we're at cross purposes" version. Mulder and Scully are a classic example of this. They largely want the same things, and they care about and respect each other, but their perception of they work they share differs staunchly in some ways. So like, it's basically their job to argue with each other (as long as the arguing is in pursuit of something and not predominantly a detriment). Ben and Leslie from Parks & Rec begin with this dynamic, as well, though they phase out of it relatively quickly.

Then there's the "they secretly kind of enjoy fighting/bickering with each other" version.

And probably a few more versions as well. Overall I just feel like there needs to be a reason why they fight/argue/bicker, and the nature of how they fight/argue/bicker has to make emotional/psychological sense when considered in conjunction with the why of it.
meadowphoenix: (Default)

[personal profile] meadowphoenix 2021-05-13 04:37 am (UTC)(link)
While I agree that Benedict/Beatrice is gold tier, I think I just need it to not cross a line. The line is different depending on the type of fighting, but I just need to know the shape of love that develops is makes sense and avoids tropes I dislike. There's needs to be some degree of believable respect at the end.


But i disagree on the intelligent/intelligent fighting. I've read some dumb/intelligent bickering that was so great. But that's much harder to do without frustrating your audience.

eta: If Archie weren't so sexist/shitty, Archie and Edith would be a good example of bickering from two different speeds of mental processing.
Edited 2021-05-13 04:59 (UTC)

(Anonymous) 2021-05-13 05:48 am (UTC)(link)
I used to love this trope, but have fallen out of it for lack of good material. Writers don't seem to understand the both characters need to be in on the same joke, and not make the bickering overly nasty. It's supposed to be fun(ny).

(Anonymous) 2021-05-13 11:50 am (UTC)(link)
I guess I'm in the minority here but I'm not a Han Solo fan and I'd never put Han/Leia in the same class as Beatrice and Benedick.

(Anonymous) 2021-05-13 02:13 pm (UTC)(link)
I've gone sour on the dynamic because so often it's done poorly and it just comes accross as two people who don't enjoy being around each other until finally the lady cracks and kisses the gent.

B/B tho, that's some good shit.

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-05-13 16:22 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-05-15 07:36 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2021-05-12 11:28 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh yeah. There was someone on a forum who was listing all the little details that make these Aniversary Editions not at all good enough to be replacements for the originals. And they even said that their friend thought her Mattel edition Kirsten was beautiful and that she had accidentally straight up told her friend the doll wasn't as good as her PC version.

There is no need to be superior and mean to people who didn't have the chance to buy the originals.

The new dolls are a chance for people to buy something approximating the old versions, but without having to fight against another fan to pay three times as much on Ebay, which alot of people can't afford to do. Kirsten in particular, never got a reboot like the others did, not even a semi secret failed one like Molly. This is the only other way to *get* a Kirsten at all at this point.

I've also seen people pointing out that AG may not be able to get some of the same materials now. It's been frigging 35 years and West Germany doesn't even exist anymore.

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-05-13 00:12 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-05-13 00:42 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-05-13 03:11 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] tabaqui - 2021-05-13 00:13 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] hey_hey_hey - 2021-05-13 00:18 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-05-13 00:38 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-05-13 01:00 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-05-13 03:17 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2021-05-12 11:13 pm (UTC)(link)
lmao god it was so bad. i can't even call it a bait and switch it just felt like the whole series was on a downward spiral that culminated in the shitshow that was the ending

(no subject)

[personal profile] bur - 2021-05-12 23:54 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-05-13 00:18 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] feotakahari - 2021-05-13 00:21 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-05-15 07:41 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-05-13 02:06 (UTC) - Expand

AYRT: Here you go :)

(Anonymous) - 2021-05-13 03:28 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-05-13 00:27 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] epicurean - 2021-05-13 01:18 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2021-05-12 11:49 pm (UTC)(link)
... No opinion on porn art with super realistic balls maybe because I don't look at them often (well, technically I may, but I guess it doesn't bother me) but I love the image choice, good job, OP.

(no subject)

[personal profile] hey_hey_hey - 2021-05-13 00:15 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-05-13 04:51 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] philstar22 - 2021-05-13 00:35 (UTC) - Expand
tabaqui: (Default)

[personal profile] tabaqui 2021-05-13 12:14 am (UTC)(link)
Neil Gaiman seems like an odd choice to quiz about this.

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-05-13 00:28 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-05-13 06:58 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-05-13 11:52 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-05-13 14:59 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-05-13 22:18 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-05-13 15:44 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] selfcrownedqueen - 2021-05-17 00:54 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-05-13 08:46 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-05-13 14:10 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2021-05-12 11:21 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't know who these people are, but I don't blame you at all for being confused. They have similar facial features, though I struggle to name exactly what.

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-05-12 23:43 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-05-13 00:14 (UTC) - Expand

Hmm.

(Anonymous) - 2021-05-13 00:12 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-05-13 00:13 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-05-13 00:15 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-05-13 00:20 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2021-05-12 11:13 pm (UTC)(link)
I had a home like that for a while. It was a multi-generational home that should have been mine but I was robbed by a drug addicted family member. I was the 9th generation to live there and wanted to raise my children there. It is where most of my happy childhood memories happened. The house is gone but I still carry it in my heart.

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-05-12 23:30 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-05-13 02:21 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-05-13 02:29 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-05-13 04:23 (UTC) - Expand

[personal profile] fscom 2021-05-12 10:58 pm (UTC)(link)
NS, NF, etc.

(Anonymous) 2021-05-13 03:26 am (UTC)(link)
I don't know if this is the right place for this, case, but the racewank troll from a couple of days ago has escalated into some pretty vile slurs and insults in this thread.

https://fandomsecrets.dreamwidth.org/2408775.html?thread=1066833991#cmt1066833991

[personal profile] fscom 2021-05-12 10:58 pm (UTC)(link)
Official advertise your fandom-related event thread.

RULES FOR THIS:
1. NO images bigger than 600x600 in either direction (banners, et cetera).
2. ONE POST PER USER under this thread.
3. What IS allowed: roleplay advertisements, fandom comms, fandom events, things like that.
4. What is NOT allowed: anything for profit, any kind of fic/art commissions, seeking 1-on-1 RP, that kind of thing.

[personal profile] fscom 2021-05-12 10:58 pm (UTC)(link)
Official clickables thread.

RULES FOR THIS:
1. NO huge images or columns of images that require scrolling, please.
2. ONE POST PER USER under in this thread.
3. If you're going to post, try to at least help the others.

[personal profile] fscom 2021-05-12 10:58 pm (UTC)(link)
General comments:

(If the thread contains spoilery/triggery content please warn/post as 2nd comment so it collapses!
Please collapse images, too!)

What’s happening, FS?

(Anonymous) 2021-05-12 11:07 pm (UTC)(link)
Tell us!

Re: What’s happening, FS?

(Anonymous) - 2021-05-12 23:09 (UTC) - Expand

Re: What’s happening, FS?

(Anonymous) - 2021-05-13 00:22 (UTC) - Expand

Re: What’s happening, FS?

(Anonymous) - 2021-05-13 01:18 (UTC) - Expand

Re: What’s happening, FS?

(Anonymous) - 2021-05-13 19:56 (UTC) - Expand

Re: What’s happening, FS?

(Anonymous) - 2021-05-12 23:18 (UTC) - Expand

Re: What’s happening, FS?

[personal profile] tabaqui - 2021-05-13 00:15 (UTC) - Expand

Re: What’s happening, FS?

(Anonymous) - 2021-05-13 00:33 (UTC) - Expand

Re: What’s happening, FS?

[personal profile] tabaqui - 2021-05-13 01:01 (UTC) - Expand

Re: What’s happening, FS?

(Anonymous) - 2021-05-13 00:47 (UTC) - Expand

Re: What’s happening, FS?

(Anonymous) - 2021-05-13 01:03 (UTC) - Expand

Re: What’s happening, FS?

[personal profile] pantswarrior - 2021-05-12 23:23 (UTC) - Expand

Re: What’s happening, FS?

[personal profile] philstar22 - 2021-05-12 23:24 (UTC) - Expand

Re: What’s happening, FS?

[personal profile] mishey22 - 2021-05-12 23:43 (UTC) - Expand

Re: What’s happening, FS?

(Anonymous) - 2021-05-13 05:54 (UTC) - Expand

Who here got Covid?

(Anonymous) - 2021-05-13 00:09 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Who here got Covid?

(Anonymous) - 2021-05-13 00:43 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Who here got Covid?

(Anonymous) - 2021-05-13 02:26 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Who here got Covid?

[personal profile] rudehannibal - 2021-05-13 02:32 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Who here got Covid?

(Anonymous) - 2021-05-13 03:08 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Who here got Covid?

(Anonymous) - 2021-05-13 04:10 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Who here got Covid?

(Anonymous) - 2021-05-13 06:02 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Who here got Covid?

(Anonymous) - 2021-05-13 07:33 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Who here got Covid?

(Anonymous) - 2024-11-07 01:33 (UTC) - Expand

Karaoke Songs

(Anonymous) - 2021-05-13 00:39 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Karaoke Songs

(Anonymous) - 2021-05-13 00:44 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Karaoke Songs

[personal profile] greghousesgf - 2021-05-13 00:46 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Karaoke Songs

[personal profile] philstar22 - 2021-05-13 01:46 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Karaoke Songs

[personal profile] rudehannibal - 2021-05-13 02:33 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Karaoke Songs

(Anonymous) - 2021-05-13 02:42 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Karaoke Songs

[personal profile] rudehannibal - 2021-05-13 02:46 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Karaoke Songs

(Anonymous) - 2021-05-13 07:33 (UTC) - Expand

[personal profile] fscom 2021-05-12 10:58 pm (UTC)(link)
Games thread!