case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2021-05-20 07:14 pm

[ SECRET POST #5249 ]


⌈ Secret Post #5249 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________


03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.







Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 09 secrets from Secret Submission Post #751.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2021-05-21 12:25 am (UTC)(link)
You can make objective generalizations about large populations, though, even if those aren't true on the level of individual persons.
philstar22: (Default)

[personal profile] philstar22 2021-05-21 12:30 am (UTC)(link)
Sure, sort of. I never said otherwise. You can see that on average more people tend to find certain things attractive. I wouldn't call that objective, I'd say it is a summary of the average opinions.

But you definitely can't then take those generalizations and start using them to mean that some people are objectively more attractive than others or that everyone always finds the same thing attractive. That's not how generalizations work, but too often people use them that way.