Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2021-06-26 05:17 pm
[ SECRET POST #5286 ]
⌈ Secret Post #5286 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 30 secrets from Secret Submission Post #756.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
I actually think it is possible for those people whose ethical philosophy is oriented toward stopping the most harm, i.e. constant trolley problems, and they are misled or blind to the truth of who is actually causing harm, to have one person smack them into better ethics. I think it's very easy to teach regular humans to dehumanize people and limit the circumstances by which they could gain more information on what's actually happening, even if they have a fairly advanced moral understanding to people they haven't dehumanized. That said, I'm just not fond of this in media, and I think the "slaveowner frees his child but not his child's slave mother" or the Jefferson, as I like to call it, is more common.
For the people who just are okay with murdering people regardless, then no.