[ SECRET POST #5308 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #5308 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 32 secrets from Secret Submission Post #760.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[meadowphoenix]

I just find it interesting in my long comment that was more about situational ethics than copyright, you honed in on the copyright.
I don't know why that's interesting. That's a) where I think you were incorrect and b) where I have enough knowledge to correct it. The rest of your comment I didn't materially disagree or agree with enough to comment. Did you want me to acknowledge that?

I think you don't understand why I'm harping on this. It's because I think it's pretty important to be clear about what actually stops and comprises legal cases. Erring on the side of caution would be to say: talk to a lawyer in a consult and listen to them about your chances, but even if you're right you will waste your life trying to get something for it. Erring on the side of caution is not making claims about copyright that aren't accurate (and you did in the first 3 minutes of that video) because you know authors have more emotion than sense, and you think telling them something incorrect will shortcut them to good decision-making.