case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2021-09-01 05:56 pm

[ SECRET POST #5353 ]


⌈ Secret Post #5353 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 14 secrets from Secret Submission Post #766.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2021-09-01 11:18 pm (UTC)(link)
I think the community involved in the Isabel Fall episode is most readily described as "online LGBT+ (and ally) science fiction fandom". It was authors and readers and people with published books and all that kind of thing. Given that, and given that Fall did in fact use a pseudonym, it seems kind of... odd to suggest that all you gotta do is use a pseudonym, or that you're not going to get significant pushback from communities that you care about and belong to for publishing stuff whether professionally or on an amateur basis.

I agree that people go too far in assuming that every online disagreement works like that. But it is a legitimate concern, and I think if anything it's worse in more professional circles and in published fiction as opposed to fanwork-centric communities.