[ SECRET POST #5356 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #5356 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 45 secrets from Secret Submission Post #767.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[sabotabby]

I think you're onto something. I watched some epic deconstruction of the Les Miz movie that described some of the technicalities of why, but basically there are few movie adaptations of musicals that I actually like. (My one exception is Cabaret, which works in both book, film, and most stage adaptations I've seen, but it's structured in such a way to be easily adaptable.)

[meadowphoenix]

Cabaret and Chicago are definitely properties that work for me in various media. But they're also an example of my weird distinction because Cabaret and Chicago the musicals feel like entirely different properties to me than Chicago and Cabaret the movies.

[sabotabby]

I think format-wise, they both lend themselves well to "this is the basic story, but make whatever changes need to happen so that it works in a different media." No one's trying to make things that work on stage work on screen.

[meadowphoenix]

yep the episodic-like nature is very malleable.