case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2021-09-06 07:00 pm

[ SECRET POST #5358 ]


⌈ Secret Post #5358 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 31 secrets from Secret Submission Post #767.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
feotakahari: (Default)

[personal profile] feotakahari 2021-09-06 11:32 pm (UTC)(link)
Snarky dialogue?

(Anonymous) 2021-09-07 03:33 pm (UTC)(link)
I’m not OP, but I share basically their entire list of things that make them hit the back-button.

And for me, snarky dialogue is one of them. At least when it’s snark without substance or wit. And Harry’s snark feels a lot less funny and clever than he seems to think.

Which could be funny if he was portrayed as someone trying to seem cool and witty, and failing. But the narrative really wants you to think he’s succeeding.

Whether the snark works is a matter of personal taste, of course. Just chiming into say that snarky dialogue isn’t a selling point on it’s own.