Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2021-09-10 06:09 pm
[ SECRET POST #5362 ]
⌈ Secret Post #5362 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

[Natsume Yuujinchou]
__________________________________________________
03.

[Joan Jett & Debbie Harry]
__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05. [SPOILERS for Ted Lasso]

__________________________________________________
06. [SPOILERS for Moral Orel]

__________________________________________________
07. [WARNING for discussion of abuse]

__________________________________________________
08. [WARNING for discussion of child sexual abuse]

__________________________________________________
09. [WARNING for discussion of domestic violence]

__________________________________________________
10. [WARNING for discussion of abuse/bullying]

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #767.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-09-10 11:32 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
This secret-poster is mad about this movie in a highly specific hyperonline way, which they have posted... online. I very much doubt that the majority of people who didn't like the movie, or had criticisms of it, are posting about how it's "dangerous" on fandom!secrets in 2021.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-09-11 12:57 am (UTC)(link)Here you go. Have a "gay people are pedos" joke video that has nothing to do with antis: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ScqLzc-p9Lg
no subject
"Antis" are, by general agreement, people with an outsize and aggressive views of relatively tame media being "dangerous," frequently along lines of "this is bad representation," which is what this secret is about. If you don't like the terminology or don't agree with my informal definition that's fine; feel free to replace "antis" with "puritanical fandom pearl-clutchers" or "people who post shit like this."
no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-09-11 02:09 am (UTC)(link)Let's agree to disagree on this. I and OP encounter enough people not attached to any sort of fandom or woke crowd who'd love to have their biases confirmed and joke about it, and you don't see any sort of the jokes IRL. I still support the idea of the book exploring one young man's self-discovery about their homosexuality, but I do not agree with how the movie executed its themes by making it a true mutual love story. Farewell.
no subject