case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2009-02-25 05:17 pm

[ SECRET POST #782 ]


⌈ Secret Post #782 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

101.


__________________________________________________



102.


__________________________________________________



103.


__________________________________________________



104.


__________________________________________________



105.


__________________________________________________



106.


__________________________________________________



107.


__________________________________________________



108.


__________________________________________________



109.


__________________________________________________



110. [repeat]


__________________________________________________



111. [repeat]


__________________________________________________



112.


__________________________________________________



113.


__________________________________________________



114.


__________________________________________________



115.


__________________________________________________



116.


__________________________________________________



117.


__________________________________________________



118.


__________________________________________________



119.


__________________________________________________



120.


__________________________________________________



121.


__________________________________________________



122.


__________________________________________________



123.


__________________________________________________



124.


__________________________________________________



125. [repeat]


__________________________________________________



126.


__________________________________________________



127.


__________________________________________________



128.


__________________________________________________



129.


__________________________________________________



130.


__________________________________________________



131.


__________________________________________________



132.


__________________________________________________



133.


__________________________________________________



134.


__________________________________________________



135.


__________________________________________________



136.


__________________________________________________



137.


__________________________________________________



138.


__________________________________________________



139.


__________________________________________________



140.


__________________________________________________



141.


__________________________________________________



142.


__________________________________________________



143.


__________________________________________________



144.


__________________________________________________



145.


__________________________________________________



146.


__________________________________________________



147.


__________________________________________________



148.


__________________________________________________



149.


__________________________________________________



150.


__________________________________________________



151.


__________________________________________________



152.


__________________________________________________



153.


__________________________________________________



154.


__________________________________________________



155.


__________________________________________________



156.


__________________________________________________



157.


__________________________________________________



158.


__________________________________________________



159.


__________________________________________________



160.


__________________________________________________



161.


__________________________________________________



162.


__________________________________________________



163.


__________________________________________________



164.


__________________________________________________



165.


__________________________________________________



166.


__________________________________________________



167.


__________________________________________________



168.



Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 07 pages, 165 secrets from Secret Submission Post #112.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 2 3 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 1 2 - too big ], [ 1 2 3 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
thene: Happy Ponyo looking up from the seabed (Default)

Re: #103

[personal profile] thene 2009-02-25 11:17 pm (UTC)(link)
When I say 'marked gender' I mean that in our society, a male gender is seen as a neutral state, and it's a female gender that needs qualifiers. This happens in numerous ways - eg. women's rights are referred to as some sort of separate category from human rights, books on topics which affect women are seen as women's literature rather than mainstream literature, etc. But yes, the fact that slash fandom targets male characters because they're male characters is one reason why I adore it - it makes women's desires central, and normalises the act of desiring men (female heterosexuality is paradoxically taboo - we're meant to just be perved at, not be the ones doing the perving). I often wonder if slash would exist without sexism. I'm not sure that it would - at least, not in the rule-34 way that it does IRL.

I think you have a good point about the fleshing out of badly-written or bit-part men, though. People really don't put as much effort into the female characters. :/

Re: #103

[identity profile] kristenell.livejournal.com 2009-02-25 11:35 pm (UTC)(link)
See, I think slash would, but it might not have a slash for slash's sake. There are plenty of people that are interested in it just because they are interested in same gender dynamics. There is also the standards thing, because I do think people have higher standards for what makes a female character interesting as opposed to what makes male characters interesting.

And I also think there is a point, where while slash is rebelling against sexism in most texts it also reinforces said sexism and creates a bit of its own shades as well. Its like a double edged sword, while you get rid of the sexism that may be inherent in the female character in the text, you bring it in with the idea that the answer is to exclude them all together. The idea that men are intrinsically more interesting because they are considered the default and that their bonds are somehow more stronger or powerful then any bonds that women may forge is deeply troubling to me.

As I am not heterosexual and do not really desire men (which, I should say lesbian slashers don't tend to write slash because they desire men, so the slash community isn't all that uniform in its motivations), and unlike a lot of fandom, I have a much harder time warming up to male characters then to female characters.

I think because of this my response to sexism in the text in regard to female characters is different from yours, (which isn't to say yours is wrong), but when I don't like how a narrative treats its female characters my response is either a) drop the series entirely and never look back or b) explore female characters through fandom, whether it be in a gen, het, or femslash way. But then for me, even if the female character is marked as woman first, I don't necessarily mean that strips that character to be uninteresting or even flat. It depends on the canon really.

What I do question about the "female-disliking as a rule" part of fandom is basing the criticism on the character due to their femaleness and just that, because I can't understand the idea that just being a woman in a text is enough to make the character wholly unlikable.

Re: #103

(Anonymous) 2009-02-25 11:35 pm (UTC)(link)
it makes women's desires central, and normalises the act of desiring men

...wut? By taking women out of the equation and depicting the men being perved after as completely uninterested in them? Normalise, I do not think it means what you think it means.
thene: Happy Ponyo looking up from the seabed (Default)

Re: #103

[personal profile] thene 2009-02-25 11:42 pm (UTC)(link)
No, I'm pretty sure of what I mean there. Making desiring men so normal that everyone does it as a matter of course - just as desiring women is supposedly so normal that everyone does it, just as we're repeatedly told that female bisexuality is supposedly a ploy to attract men, just as women are supposed to admire the looks of other women rather than of men - is normalisation. Denormalising male heterosexuality is another side of the same coin. Slash is by women for women, and taking women away from being sex objects and instead allowing us to be author and audience for a consumption of men is pretty cool imo.

One thing I haven't much thought about before, but maybe denormalising male heterosexuality is something women do in fandom in order to make it feel 'safer'? I dunno about that one - lately all my slash characters have been bi - but I can see it.

Re: #103

(Anonymous) 2009-02-25 11:49 pm (UTC)(link)
Femdom. Look into it.
thene: Happy Ponyo looking up from the seabed (Default)

Re: #103

[personal profile] thene 2009-02-26 12:37 am (UTC)(link)
What makes you think I haven't? :) I'm confused as to what you mean, though.